📌 The African Union, regional powers, and the Somali government have rejected Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, with Mogadishu demanding an immediate reversal of this act of “aggression.”
Arab countries openly accused Israel of plotting to use Somaliland as a dumping ground for Palestinians, echoing reports of Israeli intrigues in this direction.
What makes Somaliland significant?
🔴 Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991 as the US-backed Barre regime collapsed after a devastating war with Ethiopia.
🔴 The breakaway has a population of just 5 to 6 million, meaning moving even a small portion of Gaza’s 2 million people would have major repercussions (the region is food insecure, and consistently ranks among the poorest in the world).
Strategic location
♦️ Somaliland is situated on the Horn of Africa, bordering on the Gulf of Aden and the strategic Bab al-Mandab Strait, which Yemen’s Ansar Allah (Houthis) effectively closed down to Israeli shipping through most of the Gaza War, humiliating the IDF, Britain, and the US, whose strikes proved powerless to stop them.
♦️ The breakaway’s northwest is situated 400 km from Hodeidah, the strategic Houthi-run port, and ~450 km from Sanaa – the capital.
♦️ A foothold in Somaliland would thus dramatically strengthen Israel’s capabilities against Yemen, both in targeting Houthis and propping up various Yemeni factions against them.
Warning signs
🔴 Less than two weeks before recognition, a senior Israeli official told media that Tel Aviv was “communicating” with Mogadishu (see here) about joint efforts against the Houthis. Publicly rebuked, Israel went with Plan B: recognize Somaliland.
🔴 Also last month, Israel’s influential Institute for National Security Studies detailed the rationale, stressing that Somaliland’s proximity to Houthi areas “could be a game changer” and give the IDF a “forward base.”
🔴 The Institute also pointed out that Somaliland’s “location at the entrance to the Gulf of Aden…gives it a unique geostrategic importance. This strategic value was why the British Empire took control of the territory at the end of the 19th century.”
🔴 65 years after London released its Somaliland vassal, Israel is apparently trying to shackle the breakaway to a new master – itself.
Don’t bother downloading it if you don’t have the time to read this enormous, eye-opening tome. There’s history here, and sadness.
September 11, 2001, was a day that changed the world.
The 2008 financial crash and the 2020 COVID-19 hoax were continuations of that madness.
Once you know HOW the 2001 atrocity happened, you will ask WHY it happened.
This download will tell you how the atrocity happened, not why. The WHY will be revealed in due time, but not until the innocent mind-controlled in the West are ready to accept the TRUTH. That truth is more horrific than any horror movie ever filmed or horror book written.
When the WHY is known, we, the people, will know who we are as a species and from where we came.
Informed Consent for Digital ID is the Globalist’s Downfall
The World Economic Forum’s inane Digital ID ADMITS that for many people, meaningful INFORMED consent is IMPOSSIBLE.
It admits it plainly: “For populations lacking digital literacy, it may be impossible to obtain MEANINGFUL informed consent.”
This is the big chink in the Globalists’ armor.
The Globalists are building systems so complex and so quickly tied to essential services that a CONSENT tick box becomes a FICTION.
Once access to work, benefits, education, health services, and banking depends on a Gestapo DIGITAL PASS, refusal is EXCLUSION, and choice is ERASED.
You will be homeless and likely die of starvation, unless you turn to CRIME.
To survive, you WILL become a THIEF, and there will be too many of those people for the Gestapo Globalists to handle.
Technically literate or not, you CANNOT consent to what you CANNOT fully see, opt out of, or stop — and that admission is the ROPE to use to pull the whole inane digital ID project apart.
The globalists ADMIT consent will FAIL — so, simply REFUSE any digital ID you CANNOT walk away from.
Genuine informed consent for digital ID is IMPOSSIBLE.
To spell out the practical risks and legal gaps, to arm people with plain-English questions and receipts, and to urge refusal of any system that cannot be opted out of without penalty is IMPOSSIBLE.
Genuine Informed Consent for Digital ID is the Globalist’s Downfall
Informed consent is not a checkbox. It is a meaningful, voluntary, and informed agreement to terms you can understand, evaluate, and refuse without penalty. The digital ID agenda FAILS this basic standard. Even its own proponents concede that for populations lacking digital literacy, meaningful informed consent may be impossible. That admission is not a footnote—it is the fatal flaw. If people cannot truly understand the system, cannot see how it operates end to end, and cannot say no without losing access to essentials, then any “consent” is a legal fiction.
Here is the core problem: digital ID systems are being built so quickly and woven so deeply into essential services—work, benefits, education, health, travel, banking—that saying “no” is framed as opting out of life. Once access to survival is conditioned on a pass, refusal becomes exclusion. Choice is erased. When a system makes you choose between feeding your family and clicking “I agree,” that is not consent—it is coercion by design.
What genuine informed consent requires
Clear purpose: You must know exactly what the digital ID is for, what it is not for, and what stops it from being repurposed later.
Limited scope: Only the minimum data needed should be collected, and it must be clear why each item is necessary.
Transparency: You must be able to see, in plain language, who collects your data, where it is stored, who accesses it, and when.
Reversibility: You must have the right and the practical ability to revoke consent and have your data deleted, with proof.
Real alternatives: There must be an opt-out path that does not punish you with loss of essential services or economic exclusion.
Accountability: There must be independent oversight, audit logs you can obtain, and enforceable remedies for misuse.
Comprehension: Consent must be understandable to a layperson without special technical knowledge.
Digital ID FAILS these tests in practice
Complexity hides risk. If the system requires specialists to interpret how data flows across agencies, vendors, and algorithms, non-experts cannot evaluate the trade-offs. That makes “informed” consent impossible for many.
Network lock-in. Once a digital ID becomes the gateway to schools, clinics, wages, and accounts, the “choice” to refuse disappears. Consent without affordable, practical alternatives is not consent.
Purpose creep. Databases, once built, rarely shrink. New “public safety” or “fraud prevention” uses get bolted on. What started as convenience can become control.
Power asymmetry. Individuals have no bargaining power against states and megaplatforms. A take-it-or-leave-it clickwrap is not a negotiation; it is a submission.
Security and breach risk. Centralizing identity data creates a target. When—not if—breaches happen, you cannot change your biometrics like a password.
Invisible scoring. Algorithmic risk scores, fraud flags, and behind-the-scenes linkages can deny services without a transparent explanation or appeal.
Consent without choice is coercion. If refusal means losing your job, your healthcare, your benefits, or your bank account, then the checkbox is a SHAM. A system that FORCES you to say YES under threat of exclusion is NOT a contract—it’s an ultimatum.
Technically literate or not, you CANNOT consent to what you CANNOT fully see, opt out of, or stop. This is the rope that can pull the entire inane digital ID project apart: by the system’s own logic, genuine informed consent cannot be obtained at a population scale, yet consent is the fig leaf it relies on.
Plain-English questions that expose the gap
Can I access all essential services without a digital ID, with no extra fees, delays, or stigma?
What specific data are collected? Why is each element necessary? What happens if I refuse any item?
Where is my data stored? Who controls the servers? Which vendors or agencies can access it and under what legal basis?
Is the code open to an independent audit? Are the algorithms and matching thresholds transparent and contestable?
How long is my data kept? Can I request deletion and receive verifiable proof that it is actually deleted across all backups and vendors?
Will my data ever be shared with law enforcement, advertisers, or third parties? Under what conditions and with what notice to me?
Is every access to my record logged? Can I obtain a complete, human-readable access log on demand?
If I am misidentified or flagged, what is the fast-track redress process? Who pays for the harm done?
What are the penalties, explicit or hidden, for refusing or revoking consent?
Who is independently liable when things go wrong—the vendor, the agency, or both?
What genuine consent for digital ID would look like (and why it rarely exists)
Opt-out without penalty: All essential services remain fully available through non-digital channels.
Minimal, local-first data: No central honeypots; data stays with the user whenever possible.
True revocation: One-step revocation and provable deletion across all processors and backups.
Strict purpose limitation: Legal and technical barriers to prevent function creep, with automatic expiration.
Enforceable accountability: Clear liability, statutory damages, and rapid remediation for harms.
Democratic oversight: Independent watchdogs with the power to halt systems that fail consent tests.
If a digital ID system cannot meet these standards—and most cannot—then consent is not merely flawed; it is structurally impossible. The fix is not better marketing or longer privacy notices. The fix is refusal. Refuse any digital ID you cannot walk away from. Demand paper, in-person, and offline alternatives. Insist that essential services remain accessible WITHOUT a digital pass. Organize locally, document refusals and penalties, and bring those receipts to lawmakers and courts. The instant the system admits it cannot secure meaningful informed consent for everyone it intends to govern, it admits its own illegitimacy. That is the HUGE CHINK in the armor—and it is enough to bring the project to a halt.
Adios, Starmer Stalin Stazi.
How does Digital ID stop illegal aliens from entering the nation?
Answer: IT CANNOT.
UPDATE 10 November 2025:
The Digital Revolution Is a Great Mistake
By Paul Craig Roberts
Even the big banks that welcomed the revolution are finding that the cost of managing security could rise out of control and exceed the labor cost of the analogue system. Wells Fargo warns:
“In today’s digital world, scammers are using advanced tools like AI to make impersonation scams harder to detect. Caller ID can be spoofed, emails can be faked, voices can be cloned, and images can be altered.”
This makes Wells Fargo’s current security measures vulnerable. For example, the bank uses recognition of a customer’s voice as a security check for providing access to customer service concerning a depositor’s account.
Scammers are just one problem. Hackers are another. Your identity can be stolen. Your account can be stolen. Your pension can be stolen. Your home can be stolen. Your credit card and your debit card can be hijacked. Checks you have written can be intercepted and altered. Entire systems, corporations, and government agencies can be held ransom.
And then there is “customer service.” The time-consuming struggle with an AI voice, the frustration of dealing with English language-handicapped foreign “customer service representatives” with NO authority, the wait to be transferred to a supervisor, the need to go to a branch office because a previous security update erased account connections, and so on. What used to be an easily fixed problem over the telephone, answered by the third ring, can go on for days before being resolved.
It is going to get worse. The Internet CANNOT be made secure because it is an open system. Security firms tell financial firms, for example, that the best they can do is to train the company’s employees not to make mistakes that make it easy for hackers. I wonder how long before banks and financial institutions require their account holders to participate in online security courses in order for the banks to guarantee their accounts.
The big banks and the Federal Reserve might soon offer and then impose digital currency. Digital currency replaces physical means of payment, such as cash and checks. The handling and managing of physical transactions is more expensive as it requires people rather than a program to manage transactions. As the five big banks control 90% of all deposits–essentially a monopoly– their adoption of digital currency would impose it on all banks.
A digital currency means your money is no longer in your hands. It can be denied intentionally or accidentally. You no longer will have a cash hoard as a backup. Possibly, if they are permitted to exist, you could collect anonymous debit cards preloaded with specific amounts, but if digital money is to be used for control, their existence is unlikely. Moreover, hackers are as likely to be successful in diverting digital money as everything else.
The main destructive element of digital systems is that they remove humans from human contact.
Scammers have eliminated the usefulness of a telephone as a device for speaking to another person. Instead, people text. But if caller ID and emails can be compromised, so can texting.
What the digital revolution has given us is TOTAL insecurity, isolation, and enormous frustration.
Muammar Gaddafi, the former Libyan president, was killed for wanting what was best for his own people and setting a precedent of government that did not fall into place with the financial gangsters controlling the West.
Muammar Gaddafi – Former President of Libya
Contrary to the lies told to a gullible public by the mainstream media about President Gaddafi, the truth is extraordinary. Libya was the world's poorest country in 1951. Gaddafi made Libya Africa's most developed country with $150 billion in foreign reserves & ZERO debt. This was life under Gaddafi until the globalist banking gangsters murdered him.
Libya had no electricity bills; electricity came free of charge to all citizens.
There were no interest rates on loans; the banks were state-owned, and citizens' loans were, by law, 0 percent.
Gaddafi promised not to buy a house for his parents until everyone in Libya owns a home.
All newlywed couples in Libya received 60,000 dinars from the government. Because of that, they bought their own apartments & started their families.
Education and medical treatment in Libya were free of charge. Before Gaddafi, literacy in Libya was 25 percent. During his reign, literacy hit 83 percent.
If Libyans wanted to live on a farm, they received free household appliances, seeds, and livestock.
If citizens cannot receive treatment in Libya, the state would fund them $2,300 for accommodation & travel for treatment abroad.
For Libyans who bought a car, the Libyan government financed 50 percent of the price.
The price of gasoline in oil-rich Libya was $ 0.14 per liter.
Libya had no external debt, and reserves were $150 billion (now frozen worldwide).
For Libyan school leavers who couldn’t find jobs, the government paid the average salary for a while, until they found work.
Part of the oil sales in Libya were directly linked to the bank accounts of all citizens.
The mother who gave birth to a child received $5,000.
40 loaves of bread cost 15 cents.
Gaddafi implemented the world's biggest irrigation project, known as the "BIG MAN PROJECT," to ensure water availability in the desert.
The globalist bankers killed Muammar Gaddafi because he was a rebel against their system of power that is strangling the West more and more each day.
Who Ordered NATO to Execute President Gaddafi?
Click to play
A Reminder that Hillary Clinton sent the memo demanding that President Gaddafi be killed, even after voluntarily dismantling his nuclear programs. This is Hillary Clinton celebrating the death of Gaddafi.
Click to play
Libya was the only debt-free nation before NATO bombs turned it into a failed state. Vladimir Putin has been asking this for years, and the West has never had the guts to answer. The puppet masters won’t allow their Western bribed or blackmailed puppets to tell the truth.
Who Ordered JFK's Assassination?
Click to play
Muammar Gaddafi accused Israel of killing John F. Kennedy and asked the United Nations to start an investigation. 18 months later, NATO began a military intervention against Gaddafi's country and killed him.
You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel and the Mossad. They are the main group involved.
The Israeli Prime Minister at the time, David Ben-Gurion, said that "without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive."
President Kennedy asked for neutral scientists to observe Israel's nuclear reactor. He continued to push for this with CIA director John A. McCone and was finally granted access.
Israel set up a fake control room with fake control panels before the arrival of the neutral scientists. Part of the agreement was that the inspectors were never going to be allowed to inspect the reactor.
After that visit, President Kennedy is quoted to have said, "Those sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability."
The US Zionist neocons invited President Kennedy to come to Dallas, Texas. The visit was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens' Council, directed by Julius Schepps. He was director for the United Fund, the Dallas Chamber of Commerce, Radio Station WRR, the Dallas Citizens Council, and the Carruth Memorial.
Schepps was a member of the local ADL B'nai B'rith International, an American Zionist nonprofit service organization hiding under the 'Jewish' umbrella.
Abraham Zapruder, another member, just so happened to be the guy who caught the Kennedy assassination on film. He was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas Textile Building.
According to ballistic studies, it was from the Textile Building that the first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblat, one of the biggest financiers of the ADL, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon B. Johnson.
The host committee that invited President Kennedy to the Dallas event was chaired by Samuel Bloom. According to Dallas police, Bloom pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas Police Station to the Dallas County Jail.
It was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. Ruby's last name was Jacob Rubinstein.
Meanwhile, the Israeli nuclear reactor went critical right after JFK died, and had the A-bomb a year or two later.
There’s no such thing as coincidences in this Zionist matrix. There is planning, plotting, conspiracies, and intent. It is about anything and everything to preserve and increase power and control.
When a small group wants to control everything, it can only be achieved by evil means. It’s as simple as that.
What is that Israeli Nuclear Reactor?
In 1986, Dimona technician Mordechai Vanunu slipped the mask from Israel’s “nuclear ambiguity” by handing the UK's Sunday Times newspaper a cache of photographs and a granular account of how plutonium was being turned into warheads beneath the Negev desert in Israel.
Israel's national intelligence agency Mossad lured Vanunu to Rome via an agent known as “Cindy,” abducted and drugged him, and secretly shipped him to Israel. In 1988, Vanunu was tried behind closed doors, convicted of treason and espionage, and sentenced to 18 years in jail, more than 11 of which were in solitary confinement.
Israel's Threat to the West
Israel's PM has been claiming for years that Iran is weeks away from developing nukes despite "completely and totally obliterating" Iran's nuclear program back in June! You couldn't make it up! Benjamin Netanyahu is like a broken record. He thinks we’re all stupid. He’s been pushing for war with Iran for decades.
Click to play
Netanyahu in 2002
Click to play
Netanyahu in 2024
For 22 years, the Israeli Prime Minister has been misleading American taxpayers to justify war with Iran for Israeli interests. The next video shows Netanyahu using the 'Holocaust' to push for war with Iran in his final speech as Prime Minister in 2021:
Click to play
Former US President Bill Clinton says Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu needs a war with Iran because "that way he can stay in office forever and ever." Meanwhile, it is Israel that has nuclear weapons and is even willing to threaten the United States.
Proof that Israeli has Nuclear Weapons
Jonathan Pollard, the US-born Israeli spy who stole US military secrets & sold them to Israel, explains how Israel threatened the United States with nuclear weapons in response to an arms embargo back in 1973. Straight from the horse's mouth, folks.
Click to play
Now that the cat's out of the bag, Israel appears to be ramping up the threats of bombing Western cities. Netanyahu says Iran will do that. But didn't America wipe out Iran's nuke program early this year? Read between the lines; substitute "Israel" for "Iran." Here's Netanyahu talking about the possibility of Iran (substitute Israel) nuking American cities with intercontinental ballistic missiles:
Click to play
“If Israel is forced to the wall, the possibility of nuclear exchange is extremely high,” Ben Shapiro told his audience. He added that unless the United States provides material aid to Israel, it could find itself in a scenario where it’s nuking its neighbors.
The Samson Option
Most people have never heard of it, but Israel’s “Samson Option” is not a myth. It’s a real strategic doctrine that suggests if the state of Israel were ever facing destruction, it would take the rest of the world down with it. The name comes from the biblical Samson, who brought down the temple on himself and his enemies.
In practical terms, it refers to Israel’s policy of nuclear ambiguity; never confirming, never denying, yet maintaining an arsenal capable of striking not only its regional enemies, but also what Israeli strategists once called the “pillars of the world”, the great capitals of Europe.
The very nations that fund, arm, and defend Israel, the same West that calls it an “ally”, are also within its nuclear targeting range should it ever choose to pull the final lever.
It’s presented as deterrence, a last resort, a “you destroy us, we destroy everything” insurance policy, but even the existence of such a doctrine tells you something profound about the mindset behind it: not partnership, not shared values, but conditional loyalty, built on FEAR.
Does this sound like the strategy of a friend? Or the warning of a hostage-taker? Is this WHY most Western nations kow-tow to Israel's demands?
Martin Van Creveld, professor of history at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, is an expert on military history and strategy. He says Israel possesses hundreds of atomic warheads which could be fired at Europe if its existence is threatened. He said: "Most European capitals are targets for our air force."
That is blackmail.
Is it any wonder that hardly any nation in the so-called democratic West refuses to criticize Israel? Is this why former 'free' Europe has become a near replica of the former Soviet Union as the EU?
One has to ask: What really is Israel?
What is the State of Israel
The creation of Israel on May 14, 1948, following British rule and World War II's Holocaust in Poland, completed years of Zionist efforts for a new Khazarian homeland in Judea. David Ben-Gurion proclaimed Israel's independence, which was speedily recognized by the United States the same day. The subsequent 1948 Arab-Israeli War was triggered by the neighboring Arab states' invasion of the nation.
But it goes much, much deeper. Why did Khazarians from most of today's Ukraine head off to their newly-formed Israel? And why is Ukraine in conflict with its neighbor, Russia, or so it appears? There's more to all this than meets the eye.
Here's a BIG clue: Who fled from the former devil-worshipping state of Khazaria to the Holy Roman Empire (the West) after Russia and surrounding countries kicked them out because of their utterly bad behaviour (robbery, kidnapping, banditry, slavery, and Baal worship) and has since plotted to get revenge against Russia?
The same gangsters who have funded BOTH sides in every war worldwide since arriving in Manchester, England, in 1798, and setting up shop in the City of London in 1809.
Oh, how these gangsters HATE every religion, especially the Jewish one, and are now trying to start the next religious war between Christians and Muslims so that the gangsters will remain in control of the world.
The gangsters stay hidden, pretending to be central bankers, but bribe and blackmail those in authority to get their way. They've been doing that since the American War of Independence.
The gangsters attempted to use a biological weapon in 2021-21 to wipe out much of humanity, dubbed COVID-19, a result of prohibited gain-of-function research carried out at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and later transferred to Wuhan in China to keep prying eyes off. Nearly 50 biolabs were built in Ukraine to manufacture the bioweapon.
We can now see the connection between Israel and Ukraine, and the City of London, Paris, and Berne.
So, now crunch time comes: Will Israel use the Samson option soon as the gangsters lose their grip on power in the West?
In the meantime, don't fall for the Khazarian Mafia's attempts to enslave us all with digital IDs and currencies. NGOs are the gangsters' tools these days. Somehow, the world must take the blackmailing nukes away from these gangsters from Khazaria.
This article is based on posts on the Laura Aboili Telegram channel.
