The Complete Picture. Following the atrocious 9/11 Deep State event to save the corrupt Zionist-infiltrated US, the US Corporation has now been de-listed. In the meantime, the American Military Government is going after the culprits, both home and foreign. 45—47. 12 years to drain the swamp. 2016—2028.
See the Complete Picture
25 March, 2026
Why do George W. Bush’s comments matter if the US military operation in Iran is NOT a ‘declared’ War?
Think back to 2002 and the Iraq War. The Iraq War was a ‘declared’ War, as it specifically had (and still has) a Resolution by Congress in 2002. That War is still ‘declared’ because the drawdown and removal of all troops was incomplete. In 2001, the US Congress passed the ‘Ghost Authorization’ – the Authorization for the use of Military force, which is still in effect.
The Ghost Authorization in 2001 was the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which can be seen as a ‘blank check’ or a ‘ghost’ authority because it has been used for over two decades to justify military actions far beyond the original intent of Congress following 9/11.
The AUMF authorizes the President to use ALL “necessary appropriate force” against nations, organizations, or persons involved in the 9/11 attacks. That means ANY President can use it until terminated.
Think carefully about that. It means once you admit to the Iraq War being a declared “War by Law,” you MUST believe, or you ADMIT by inadvertent truth or accidental truth, that President Donald J. Trump has the same authority, the same power, and the same command.
Why?
Because the only thing that directly relates to PDJT in the War Powers Resolution Act is Section §1550, which is specifically dated 20 December, 2019.
Yet it was codified as temporary, as it is a section of the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act, which a Democrat-controlled House passed with Nancy Pelosi as the then Speaker.
The Executive Document at the bottom of §1550 shows Joe Biden relinquishing all power and authority to the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin.
Why would a sitting President relinquish power and authority to the Secretary of Defense when no other President has ever done that?
Is it because the new sitting President could NOT command on his own?
Think about that.
The ONLY way that can happen is when the government is actually a Military one. Military Government and Continuity of Government had already been invoked in 2020.
As of 25 March 2026, the December 7 and 10, 2020, Executive Orders 13961 and 13963 remain in effect. A portion of 13961 was PARTIALLY revoked, meaning the other is still in effect, which means on the backside of a Continuity of Government.
The American government is in exile, and a shadow or puppet government is acting as what most people believe is a civilian government.
Meanwhile, the American Military Government is operating irregular and unconventional warfare strategies and tactics.
Joe Biden and Congress are puppets for a Continuity of Government as the Military drained the treasonous Swamp.
No one can prove this fact wrong. Law is a written discipline and reads the way it does.
Acknowledging Iraq has a Declaration via Resolution means you must acknowledge or inadvertently truthfully admit that Congress gave President DJT authority and Resolution in §1550 as the date accompanies all the executive actions immediately following, all of which were NOT terminated from 2021 to 2025.
It is still in effect today.
And President DJT validates this with the ‘Law of War Manual’ terms straight out of the Military Occupation Chapter. In almost every speech, as during the November and December 2, 2025 speeches, he says that all Executive Actions by Joe Biden NEVER EXISTED.
The Law outlines exactly what it outlines, but you need to know the Military portion, Lawfully, to have a complete picture.
24 March is the anniversary of one of the most heinous crimes committed by the Nazis and their collaborators — the destruction of the Belarusian village of Khatyn and all its inhabitants in 1943.
Maria Zakharova, in her column on the Izvestia website, wrote about attempts to glorify Ukrainian participants in the Khatyn massacre in the West. At that time, 149 people, including 75 children, were burned alive.
According to Zakharova, the punitive operation was carried out by the SS Sonderkommando “Dirlewanger” together with the 118th Schutzmannschaft battalion, formed from Ukrainian nationalists. Most of the participants in the massacre were subsequently punished, but some of them managed to escape to the West, where they avoided responsibility and continued their activities in exile.
The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry drew attention to attempts to glorify Nazi collaborators and distort historical truth. Zakharova noted that preserving the memory of Khatyn is not only a tribute to the victims but also an important element in combating modern manifestations of neo-Nazism and the rewriting of history.
The obituary of the commander of the 118th battalion, Konstantin Smovsky, in the emigrant newspaper “Svoboda”. Not a word about Khatyn. Only “merits” to Ukraine.
For over 70 years, few have paid attention to this crime against humanity, and they still don’t.
So, why is Russia ‘peacefully’ trying to point this out to the dumbshit West, which doesn’t give a crap about the victims of Rothschild Zionist Nazi Satanist’s funded wars?
Trying to make the mind-controlled understand is futile because they are ignorant of history.
The Rothschilds fund BOTH sides in their created wars, and always profit.
The Rothschilds are the spawn of the scumbag Luciferian Baal-worshiping Satanists kicked out of former Khazaria (most of today’s Ukraine) centuries ago, who then fled to the Holy Roman Empire (the idiot West) to infiltrate it to get revenge on Russia and the other states in the Russian Federation that booted the scumbags out.
And don’t forget that the Rothschild bankers created the former USSR, the CCP, and the EU, plus the UN, plus the WEF, and the pure evil WHO.
The day when the Rothschilds are defunded and made impotent will be this planet’s liberation day.
That day is fast coming as the Rothschilds’ attack dogs, called the conflict-crazy Satanic Zionist military-industrial complex, with the US Corporation (NOT America) and the blackmailing and bribing Zionist Satanic state of ‘New Khazaria’ called Israel, get their assets and arses a good kick up the backside.
Laura Aboli says the following. It’s likely correct. (My emphasis added).
One of the things I find most remarkable about this conflict is the restraint of the neighbouring nations in the region.
You have countries like the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain that are directly feeling the consequences of this conflict, whether through strikes, instability, or the very real economic bleed that comes with it. Tourism slows, investment hesitates, infrastructure is put at risk, and entire sectors, from hospitality to energy, take a hit. Places like Dubai rely on perception, on stability, on confidence. And yet, despite all of this, they are not reacting the way one might expect.
This region has every reason to spiral. One misstep, one overreaction, and this becomes something far bigger, far uglier, far more uncontrollable. But instead, what we are seeing is a level of composure that feels deliberate, almost coordinated in its restraint.
When you listen carefully to Qatar, to Turkey, to Oman, there is a pattern; even when Iran strikes, even when they themselves are affected, the finger doesn’t ultimately settle on Tehran… it drifts back to Israel.
That, to me, is telling. It suggests that these nations are not reacting to isolated events because they have a broader understanding of what is unfolding; they know this is not a simple Iran versus the region conflict, but something far more layered and complex, and are choosing, consciously, not to take the bait.
Because yes, Iran has long been a destabilising force in the region, and no one is pretending otherwise. But the way this is being handled, the restraint, the refusal to escalate, the careful language, points to a shared awareness that this moment is about more than just Iran.
Let’s not forget these nations have an outstanding relationship with Trump, and I think they know there is a complex strategy at play to expose and eventually neutralise Israel. After all, it’s Israel, and not Iran, that has nuclear weapons.
They understand that what is playing out requires patience, not reaction… and that losing control now would derail something far more significant.
Whether people want to see it or not, the region is behaving as if it knows who the real axis of this conflict is, and ultimately, it’s not Iran.
The mainstream media has claimed for the past 3 years that Ukraine was winning and Russia’s defeat was imminent. We are now hearing that Iran’s defeat is imminent.
Then why is DJT talking about sending American troops to Iran?
Why is the CIA offering huge bribes to Kurdish leaders to send Kurdish men to die for Israel in Iran?
Why were executives of American armament companies hastily summoned to the Pentagon to advise on how quickly Washington’s depleted supply of missiles can be restocked?
And why have Japan and South Korea been told to return to the US the missiles supplied to them?
The answer is obvious. Iran must be winning.
It is blatantly obvious that the US can’t protect the small Arab city-states that are sites for American air and naval bases.
So, what gives?
Answer: Iran has yet to use its hypersonic missiles. It is likely waiting patiently to use those to severely punish the US, Israel, and the Arab oil-producing countries once Washington and Israel are empty of missiles for air defense.
The Strait of Hormuz is effectively shut, meaning oil tankers are stuck. When the petrodollar ceases to underwrite American AI data centers, a massive stock market contraction will occur, and all Hell will break loose in the West.
Who will get the flak in America? Answer: DJT and Netanyahu. The Zionist agenda for a Greater Israel will be over.
Russia and China must eventually cease to continue their mindless policy of turning a blind eye to reality and stop going after trade deals. Their own survival is much more important.
In 2009, Virginia Giuffre accepted $500,000 from Jeffrey Epstein to drop a lawsuit, the terms of which forbade claims against other “potential defendants.”
13 years later, in 2022, Giuffre received some $16 million from the British royal, Prince Andrew, in an out-of-court settlement in which he admitted to no wrongdoing.
She was not required to keep to the terms of the previous settlement in which she released other “potential defendants.”
Her attorneys likely smelled a large fee from a charge against Prince Andrew.
Public accusations in a lawsuit would embarrass the Royal family and result in a large out-of-court settlement, whether the charge was true or false.
It is possible that the charge is false, but that $16 million was too much to walk away from.
As lawyers understand, many “settlements” are “extortions.”
The emphasis in the fake news-spreading mainstream media (MSM) is always that the women were under the age of 16.
That was 2 to 3 decades ago.
The MSM’s insistence on underage sex seems be a hoax.
It actually looks like prostitution.
Is it really true that the Virginia Giuffre, smiling and looking pleased with herself, standing together with Prince Andrew, was actually kidnapped and brought to Epstein’s Island by force and coercion?
Well, what about the hundreds or thousands of other underage girls who were allegedly kidnapped and forced into sex trafficking?
How exactly did Epstein manage a kidnapping operation of this order of magnitude?
Do the millions of pages of the Epstein files and his income tax returns indicate income from the sex-trafficking of hundreds of children?
From investigators’ reports of Epstein’s sources of income, his main source of income was devising tax evasion schemes for a few clients.
Virginia Giuffre’s large settlement payments likely inspired other women.
As there were allegedly so many rich and distinguished men who visited the alleged sex Island, people such as Bill Gates and former US President Bill Clinton, why then are ONLY Epstein and Prince Andrew targeted?
Something Very Big Stinks
Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase agreed to major settlements in 2023 regarding lawsuits from victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
Deutsche Bank paid $75 million in May 2023 to settle a class-action lawsuit.
JPMorgan Chase paid a $290 million settlement in June 2023 to resolve a separate lawsuit brought by women who accused the bank of facilitating the trafficking.
These are nebulous charges with an unclear legal basis.
It certainly looks like a witch hunt.
In 2019, Time Magazine reported that a judge allowed 23 women who claimed to be Epstein victims to speak in his court before he dismissed charges against Epstein.
About half did so anonymously.
The women urged prosecutors to investigate potential co-conspirators.
Maybe there is little that people will not do for money.
Indeed, a compensation fund was set up to indemnify Epstein’s victims.
Following Epstein’s alleged suicide in August 2019, the executors of his estate established the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program (VCP), which was launched in June 2020.
Here’s the thing: If hundreds of underage girls are sex-trafficked, supposedly each to many men, how come Prince Andrew is the ONLY man identified?
Allegedly, Epstein’s clients were the ELITE … but only ONE is identified.
The only evidence against Prince Andrew is that he paid to settle a claim.
But people do this to avoid the cost and publicity of a lawsuit.
In other words, many false claims ARE settled because it is the CHEAPEST way out.
The big question is: Where are the other 3 million files?
In other words, the fact that there is no evidence of enormous sex-trafficking is considered as proof that there was one, and the elites are being protected by withholding the evidence.
We are all being gaslighted.
We are under psychological manipulation where an abuser makes someone question their own reality, memory, or perceptions to gain power and control.
The Salem Witch Trials lacked evidence, but that did not protect the accused from being found guilty.
It’s beginning to look like the Epstein saga is a concoction to divert attention from the probability that Epstein was running a BLACKMAIL operation.
For Israel, focused on ELITES in positions able to align American and European Middle East policy with that of Israel’s?
This is a case justifying an investigation into whether the Epstein sex-trafficking saga is a concoction to hide the fact that Western elites were blackmailed into supporting the post 9/11 fake War on Terror to advance the Zionist agenda of a Greater Israel.
Prince Andrew was arrested on SUSPICION of misconduct in public office.
What? Since when was SUSPICION proof of a crime?
An arrest warrant CANNOT be issued on suspicion.
How thick can the fake news reporters be?
Andrew was arrested on suspicion that he MIGHT have shared with Epstein his work as a British trade negotiator.
Really?
We are all being GASLIGHTED, folks.
What is the alleged sex-trafficker Epstein’s interest in British trade negotiations?
Indeed, the British communist Starmer’s government has NO evidence whatsoever that Andrew shared trade negotiating information with Epstein.
It ONLY has a “SUSPICION.”
Police CANNOT arrest people on suspicion.
Police must have evidence that they can present to a judge and get a warrant.
It is now blatantly obvious that British “justice” does NOT work the way it is supposed to in a free country.
People’s reputations are ruined by being arrested on suspicion without evidence.
So, we are all being gaslighted by the BLACKMAILERS.
The possibility that evil Khazarian Zionists (not Jews) can concoct such a cover story to hide their blackmail operation and have it accepted by the entirety of the Western fake news mainstream media and idiot politicians is deeply worrying.
So, the Epstein fallout is a cover to keep focus off the blackmail operation.
We are witnessing the Salem Witch Trials 2.0, with Price Andrew as the ONLY witch on trial while the blackmail continues behind the scenes.
“Former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on SUSPICION of misconduct in public office. The younger brother of King Charles III was previously stripped of his titles after details emerged about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“The Epstein fallout continues to spread. Bill Gates scrapped a keynote at a major AI summit in New Delhi, with his foundation saying the move was intended to keep attention on the event amid renewed scrutiny of his past ties to Epstein.
“Apollo Global Management has also sought to reassure clients that its top executives had no relationship with the disgraced financier after newly released Justice Department files named several employees, including CEO Marc Rowan.”
Stop being gaslighted, folks.
Being gaslighted is a form of psychological manipulation where an abuser makes someone question their own reality, memory, or perceptions to gain power and control.
It is a persistent pattern of behavior, often involving denial of facts, trivializing feelings, and twisting conversations, causing victims to doubt their sanity.
Aspects of being gaslighted include:
Signs: Constant self-doubt, apologizing frequently, wondering if you are “too sensitive,” and losing confidence in your judgment.
Tactics: The abuser may say “that never happened,” “you’re imagining things,” or “you’re too sensitive,” even when evidence contradicts them.
Context: While often used in romantic relationships as a form of coercive control, it can also occur in work or family settings.
Impact: It leads to extreme confusion, anxiety, and isolation, causing victims to rely heavily on the manipulator.
Recovery: Rebuilding self-trust, documenting events, setting boundaries, and seeking therapy or support from friends/family is crucial to stopping the abuse.
Galslighting is recognized as a form of abuse, and in some contexts, such as the UK, it can be considered a criminal offense under coercive control laws.
📌 The African Union, regional powers, and the Somali government have rejected Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, with Mogadishu demanding an immediate reversal of this act of “aggression.”
Arab countries openly accused Israel of plotting to use Somaliland as a dumping ground for Palestinians, echoing reports of Israeli intrigues in this direction.
What makes Somaliland significant?
🔴 Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991 as the US-backed Barre regime collapsed after a devastating war with Ethiopia.
🔴 The breakaway has a population of just 5 to 6 million, meaning moving even a small portion of Gaza’s 2 million people would have major repercussions (the region is food insecure, and consistently ranks among the poorest in the world).
Strategic location
♦️ Somaliland is situated on the Horn of Africa, bordering on the Gulf of Aden and the strategic Bab al-Mandab Strait, which Yemen’s Ansar Allah (Houthis) effectively closed down to Israeli shipping through most of the Gaza War, humiliating the IDF, Britain, and the US, whose strikes proved powerless to stop them.
♦️ The breakaway’s northwest is situated 400 km from Hodeidah, the strategic Houthi-run port, and ~450 km from Sanaa – the capital.
♦️ A foothold in Somaliland would thus dramatically strengthen Israel’s capabilities against Yemen, both in targeting Houthis and propping up various Yemeni factions against them.
Warning signs
🔴 Less than two weeks before recognition, a senior Israeli official told media that Tel Aviv was “communicating” with Mogadishu (see here) about joint efforts against the Houthis. Publicly rebuked, Israel went with Plan B: recognize Somaliland.
🔴 Also last month, Israel’s influential Institute for National Security Studies detailed the rationale, stressing that Somaliland’s proximity to Houthi areas “could be a game changer” and give the IDF a “forward base.”
🔴 The Institute also pointed out that Somaliland’s “location at the entrance to the Gulf of Aden…gives it a unique geostrategic importance. This strategic value was why the British Empire took control of the territory at the end of the 19th century.”
🔴 65 years after London released its Somaliland vassal, Israel is apparently trying to shackle the breakaway to a new master – itself.
Don’t bother downloading it if you don’t have the time to read this enormous, eye-opening tome. There’s history here, and sadness.
September 11, 2001, was a day that changed the world.
The 2008 financial crash and the 2020 COVID-19 hoax were continuations of that madness.
Once you know HOW the 2001 atrocity happened, you will ask WHY it happened.
This download will tell you how the atrocity happened, not why. The WHY will be revealed in due time, but not until the innocent mind-controlled in the West are ready to accept the TRUTH. That truth is more horrific than any horror movie ever filmed or horror book written.
When the WHY is known, we, the people, will know who we are as a species and from where we came.
Informed Consent for Digital ID is the Globalist’s Downfall
The World Economic Forum’s inane Digital ID ADMITS that for many people, meaningful INFORMED consent is IMPOSSIBLE.
It admits it plainly: “For populations lacking digital literacy, it may be impossible to obtain MEANINGFUL informed consent.”
This is the big chink in the Globalists’ armor.
The Globalists are building systems so complex and so quickly tied to essential services that a CONSENT tick box becomes a FICTION.
Once access to work, benefits, education, health services, and banking depends on a Gestapo DIGITAL PASS, refusal is EXCLUSION, and choice is ERASED.
You will be homeless and likely die of starvation, unless you turn to CRIME.
To survive, you WILL become a THIEF, and there will be too many of those people for the Gestapo Globalists to handle.
Technically literate or not, you CANNOT consent to what you CANNOT fully see, opt out of, or stop — and that admission is the ROPE to use to pull the whole inane digital ID project apart.
The globalists ADMIT consent will FAIL — so, simply REFUSE any digital ID you CANNOT walk away from.
Genuine informed consent for digital ID is IMPOSSIBLE.
To spell out the practical risks and legal gaps, to arm people with plain-English questions and receipts, and to urge refusal of any system that cannot be opted out of without penalty is IMPOSSIBLE.
Genuine Informed Consent for Digital ID is the Globalist’s Downfall
Informed consent is not a checkbox. It is a meaningful, voluntary, and informed agreement to terms you can understand, evaluate, and refuse without penalty. The digital ID agenda FAILS this basic standard. Even its own proponents concede that for populations lacking digital literacy, meaningful informed consent may be impossible. That admission is not a footnote—it is the fatal flaw. If people cannot truly understand the system, cannot see how it operates end to end, and cannot say no without losing access to essentials, then any “consent” is a legal fiction.
Here is the core problem: digital ID systems are being built so quickly and woven so deeply into essential services—work, benefits, education, health, travel, banking—that saying “no” is framed as opting out of life. Once access to survival is conditioned on a pass, refusal becomes exclusion. Choice is erased. When a system makes you choose between feeding your family and clicking “I agree,” that is not consent—it is coercion by design.
What genuine informed consent requires
Clear purpose: You must know exactly what the digital ID is for, what it is not for, and what stops it from being repurposed later.
Limited scope: Only the minimum data needed should be collected, and it must be clear why each item is necessary.
Transparency: You must be able to see, in plain language, who collects your data, where it is stored, who accesses it, and when.
Reversibility: You must have the right and the practical ability to revoke consent and have your data deleted, with proof.
Real alternatives: There must be an opt-out path that does not punish you with loss of essential services or economic exclusion.
Accountability: There must be independent oversight, audit logs you can obtain, and enforceable remedies for misuse.
Comprehension: Consent must be understandable to a layperson without special technical knowledge.
Digital ID FAILS these tests in practice
Complexity hides risk. If the system requires specialists to interpret how data flows across agencies, vendors, and algorithms, non-experts cannot evaluate the trade-offs. That makes “informed” consent impossible for many.
Network lock-in. Once a digital ID becomes the gateway to schools, clinics, wages, and accounts, the “choice” to refuse disappears. Consent without affordable, practical alternatives is not consent.
Purpose creep. Databases, once built, rarely shrink. New “public safety” or “fraud prevention” uses get bolted on. What started as convenience can become control.
Power asymmetry. Individuals have no bargaining power against states and megaplatforms. A take-it-or-leave-it clickwrap is not a negotiation; it is a submission.
Security and breach risk. Centralizing identity data creates a target. When—not if—breaches happen, you cannot change your biometrics like a password.
Invisible scoring. Algorithmic risk scores, fraud flags, and behind-the-scenes linkages can deny services without a transparent explanation or appeal.
Consent without choice is coercion. If refusal means losing your job, your healthcare, your benefits, or your bank account, then the checkbox is a SHAM. A system that FORCES you to say YES under threat of exclusion is NOT a contract—it’s an ultimatum.
Technically literate or not, you CANNOT consent to what you CANNOT fully see, opt out of, or stop. This is the rope that can pull the entire inane digital ID project apart: by the system’s own logic, genuine informed consent cannot be obtained at a population scale, yet consent is the fig leaf it relies on.
Plain-English questions that expose the gap
Can I access all essential services without a digital ID, with no extra fees, delays, or stigma?
What specific data are collected? Why is each element necessary? What happens if I refuse any item?
Where is my data stored? Who controls the servers? Which vendors or agencies can access it and under what legal basis?
Is the code open to an independent audit? Are the algorithms and matching thresholds transparent and contestable?
How long is my data kept? Can I request deletion and receive verifiable proof that it is actually deleted across all backups and vendors?
Will my data ever be shared with law enforcement, advertisers, or third parties? Under what conditions and with what notice to me?
Is every access to my record logged? Can I obtain a complete, human-readable access log on demand?
If I am misidentified or flagged, what is the fast-track redress process? Who pays for the harm done?
What are the penalties, explicit or hidden, for refusing or revoking consent?
Who is independently liable when things go wrong—the vendor, the agency, or both?
What genuine consent for digital ID would look like (and why it rarely exists)
Opt-out without penalty: All essential services remain fully available through non-digital channels.
Minimal, local-first data: No central honeypots; data stays with the user whenever possible.
True revocation: One-step revocation and provable deletion across all processors and backups.
Strict purpose limitation: Legal and technical barriers to prevent function creep, with automatic expiration.
Enforceable accountability: Clear liability, statutory damages, and rapid remediation for harms.
Democratic oversight: Independent watchdogs with the power to halt systems that fail consent tests.
If a digital ID system cannot meet these standards—and most cannot—then consent is not merely flawed; it is structurally impossible. The fix is not better marketing or longer privacy notices. The fix is refusal. Refuse any digital ID you cannot walk away from. Demand paper, in-person, and offline alternatives. Insist that essential services remain accessible WITHOUT a digital pass. Organize locally, document refusals and penalties, and bring those receipts to lawmakers and courts. The instant the system admits it cannot secure meaningful informed consent for everyone it intends to govern, it admits its own illegitimacy. That is the HUGE CHINK in the armor—and it is enough to bring the project to a halt.
Adios, Starmer Stalin Stazi.
How does Digital ID stop illegal aliens from entering the nation?
Answer: IT CANNOT.
UPDATE 10 November 2025:
The Digital Revolution Is a Great Mistake
By Paul Craig Roberts
Even the big banks that welcomed the revolution are finding that the cost of managing security could rise out of control and exceed the labor cost of the analogue system. Wells Fargo warns:
“In today’s digital world, scammers are using advanced tools like AI to make impersonation scams harder to detect. Caller ID can be spoofed, emails can be faked, voices can be cloned, and images can be altered.”
This makes Wells Fargo’s current security measures vulnerable. For example, the bank uses recognition of a customer’s voice as a security check for providing access to customer service concerning a depositor’s account.
Scammers are just one problem. Hackers are another. Your identity can be stolen. Your account can be stolen. Your pension can be stolen. Your home can be stolen. Your credit card and your debit card can be hijacked. Checks you have written can be intercepted and altered. Entire systems, corporations, and government agencies can be held ransom.
And then there is “customer service.” The time-consuming struggle with an AI voice, the frustration of dealing with English language-handicapped foreign “customer service representatives” with NO authority, the wait to be transferred to a supervisor, the need to go to a branch office because a previous security update erased account connections, and so on. What used to be an easily fixed problem over the telephone, answered by the third ring, can go on for days before being resolved.
It is going to get worse. The Internet CANNOT be made secure because it is an open system. Security firms tell financial firms, for example, that the best they can do is to train the company’s employees not to make mistakes that make it easy for hackers. I wonder how long before banks and financial institutions require their account holders to participate in online security courses in order for the banks to guarantee their accounts.
The big banks and the Federal Reserve might soon offer and then impose digital currency. Digital currency replaces physical means of payment, such as cash and checks. The handling and managing of physical transactions is more expensive as it requires people rather than a program to manage transactions. As the five big banks control 90% of all deposits–essentially a monopoly– their adoption of digital currency would impose it on all banks.
A digital currency means your money is no longer in your hands. It can be denied intentionally or accidentally. You no longer will have a cash hoard as a backup. Possibly, if they are permitted to exist, you could collect anonymous debit cards preloaded with specific amounts, but if digital money is to be used for control, their existence is unlikely. Moreover, hackers are as likely to be successful in diverting digital money as everything else.
The main destructive element of digital systems is that they remove humans from human contact.
Scammers have eliminated the usefulness of a telephone as a device for speaking to another person. Instead, people text. But if caller ID and emails can be compromised, so can texting.
What the digital revolution has given us is TOTAL insecurity, isolation, and enormous frustration.
Muammar Gaddafi, the former Libyan president, was killed for wanting what was best for his own people and setting a precedent of government that did not fall into place with the financial gangsters controlling the West.
Muammar Gaddafi – Former President of Libya
Contrary to the lies told to a gullible public by the mainstream media about President Gaddafi, the truth is extraordinary. Libya was the world's poorest country in 1951. Gaddafi made Libya Africa's most developed country with $150 billion in foreign reserves & ZERO debt. This was life under Gaddafi until the globalist banking gangsters murdered him.
Libya had no electricity bills; electricity came free of charge to all citizens.
There were no interest rates on loans; the banks were state-owned, and citizens' loans were, by law, 0 percent.
Gaddafi promised not to buy a house for his parents until everyone in Libya owns a home.
All newlywed couples in Libya received 60,000 dinars from the government. Because of that, they bought their own apartments & started their families.
Education and medical treatment in Libya were free of charge. Before Gaddafi, literacy in Libya was 25 percent. During his reign, literacy hit 83 percent.
If Libyans wanted to live on a farm, they received free household appliances, seeds, and livestock.
If citizens cannot receive treatment in Libya, the state would fund them $2,300 for accommodation & travel for treatment abroad.
For Libyans who bought a car, the Libyan government financed 50 percent of the price.
The price of gasoline in oil-rich Libya was $ 0.14 per liter.
Libya had no external debt, and reserves were $150 billion (now frozen worldwide).
For Libyan school leavers who couldn’t find jobs, the government paid the average salary for a while, until they found work.
Part of the oil sales in Libya were directly linked to the bank accounts of all citizens.
The mother who gave birth to a child received $5,000.
40 loaves of bread cost 15 cents.
Gaddafi implemented the world's biggest irrigation project, known as the "BIG MAN PROJECT," to ensure water availability in the desert.
The globalist bankers killed Muammar Gaddafi because he was a rebel against their system of power that is strangling the West more and more each day.
Who Ordered NATO to Execute President Gaddafi?
Click to play
A Reminder that Hillary Clinton sent the memo demanding that President Gaddafi be killed, even after voluntarily dismantling his nuclear programs. This is Hillary Clinton celebrating the death of Gaddafi.
Click to play
Libya was the only debt-free nation before NATO bombs turned it into a failed state. Vladimir Putin has been asking this for years, and the West has never had the guts to answer. The puppet masters won’t allow their Western bribed or blackmailed puppets to tell the truth.
Who Ordered JFK's Assassination?
Click to play
Muammar Gaddafi accused Israel of killing John F. Kennedy and asked the United Nations to start an investigation. 18 months later, NATO began a military intervention against Gaddafi's country and killed him.
You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel and the Mossad. They are the main group involved.
The Israeli Prime Minister at the time, David Ben-Gurion, said that "without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive."
President Kennedy asked for neutral scientists to observe Israel's nuclear reactor. He continued to push for this with CIA director John A. McCone and was finally granted access.
Israel set up a fake control room with fake control panels before the arrival of the neutral scientists. Part of the agreement was that the inspectors were never going to be allowed to inspect the reactor.
After that visit, President Kennedy is quoted to have said, "Those sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability."
The US Zionist neocons invited President Kennedy to come to Dallas, Texas. The visit was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens' Council, directed by Julius Schepps. He was director for the United Fund, the Dallas Chamber of Commerce, Radio Station WRR, the Dallas Citizens Council, and the Carruth Memorial.
Schepps was a member of the local ADL B'nai B'rith International, an American Zionist nonprofit service organization hiding under the 'Jewish' umbrella.
Abraham Zapruder, another member, just so happened to be the guy who caught the Kennedy assassination on film. He was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas Textile Building.
According to ballistic studies, it was from the Textile Building that the first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblat, one of the biggest financiers of the ADL, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon B. Johnson.
The host committee that invited President Kennedy to the Dallas event was chaired by Samuel Bloom. According to Dallas police, Bloom pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas Police Station to the Dallas County Jail.
It was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. Ruby's last name was Jacob Rubinstein.
Meanwhile, the Israeli nuclear reactor went critical right after JFK died, and had the A-bomb a year or two later.
There’s no such thing as coincidences in this Zionist matrix. There is planning, plotting, conspiracies, and intent. It is about anything and everything to preserve and increase power and control.
When a small group wants to control everything, it can only be achieved by evil means. It’s as simple as that.
What is that Israeli Nuclear Reactor?
In 1986, Dimona technician Mordechai Vanunu slipped the mask from Israel’s “nuclear ambiguity” by handing the UK's Sunday Times newspaper a cache of photographs and a granular account of how plutonium was being turned into warheads beneath the Negev desert in Israel.
Israel's national intelligence agency Mossad lured Vanunu to Rome via an agent known as “Cindy,” abducted and drugged him, and secretly shipped him to Israel. In 1988, Vanunu was tried behind closed doors, convicted of treason and espionage, and sentenced to 18 years in jail, more than 11 of which were in solitary confinement.
Israel's Threat to the West
Israel's PM has been claiming for years that Iran is weeks away from developing nukes despite "completely and totally obliterating" Iran's nuclear program back in June! You couldn't make it up! Benjamin Netanyahu is like a broken record. He thinks we’re all stupid. He’s been pushing for war with Iran for decades.
Click to play
Netanyahu in 2002
Click to play
Netanyahu in 2024
For 22 years, the Israeli Prime Minister has been misleading American taxpayers to justify war with Iran for Israeli interests. The next video shows Netanyahu using the 'Holocaust' to push for war with Iran in his final speech as Prime Minister in 2021:
Click to play
Former US President Bill Clinton says Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu needs a war with Iran because "that way he can stay in office forever and ever." Meanwhile, it is Israel that has nuclear weapons and is even willing to threaten the United States.
Proof that Israeli has Nuclear Weapons
Jonathan Pollard, the US-born Israeli spy who stole US military secrets & sold them to Israel, explains how Israel threatened the United States with nuclear weapons in response to an arms embargo back in 1973. Straight from the horse's mouth, folks.
Click to play
Now that the cat's out of the bag, Israel appears to be ramping up the threats of bombing Western cities. Netanyahu says Iran will do that. But didn't America wipe out Iran's nuke program early this year? Read between the lines; substitute "Israel" for "Iran." Here's Netanyahu talking about the possibility of Iran (substitute Israel) nuking American cities with intercontinental ballistic missiles:
Click to play
“If Israel is forced to the wall, the possibility of nuclear exchange is extremely high,” Ben Shapiro told his audience. He added that unless the United States provides material aid to Israel, it could find itself in a scenario where it’s nuking its neighbors.
The Samson Option
Most people have never heard of it, but Israel’s “Samson Option” is not a myth. It’s a real strategic doctrine that suggests if the state of Israel were ever facing destruction, it would take the rest of the world down with it. The name comes from the biblical Samson, who brought down the temple on himself and his enemies.
In practical terms, it refers to Israel’s policy of nuclear ambiguity; never confirming, never denying, yet maintaining an arsenal capable of striking not only its regional enemies, but also what Israeli strategists once called the “pillars of the world”, the great capitals of Europe.
The very nations that fund, arm, and defend Israel, the same West that calls it an “ally”, are also within its nuclear targeting range should it ever choose to pull the final lever.
It’s presented as deterrence, a last resort, a “you destroy us, we destroy everything” insurance policy, but even the existence of such a doctrine tells you something profound about the mindset behind it: not partnership, not shared values, but conditional loyalty, built on FEAR.
Does this sound like the strategy of a friend? Or the warning of a hostage-taker? Is this WHY most Western nations kow-tow to Israel's demands?
Martin Van Creveld, professor of history at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, is an expert on military history and strategy. He says Israel possesses hundreds of atomic warheads which could be fired at Europe if its existence is threatened. He said: "Most European capitals are targets for our air force."
That is blackmail.
Is it any wonder that hardly any nation in the so-called democratic West refuses to criticize Israel? Is this why former 'free' Europe has become a near replica of the former Soviet Union as the EU?
One has to ask: What really is Israel?
What is the State of Israel
The creation of Israel on May 14, 1948, following British rule and World War II's Holocaust in Poland, completed years of Zionist efforts for a new Khazarian homeland in Judea. David Ben-Gurion proclaimed Israel's independence, which was speedily recognized by the United States the same day. The subsequent 1948 Arab-Israeli War was triggered by the neighboring Arab states' invasion of the nation.
But it goes much, much deeper. Why did Khazarians from most of today's Ukraine head off to their newly-formed Israel? And why is Ukraine in conflict with its neighbor, Russia, or so it appears? There's more to all this than meets the eye.
Here's a BIG clue: Who fled from the former devil-worshipping state of Khazaria to the Holy Roman Empire (the West) after Russia and surrounding countries kicked them out because of their utterly bad behaviour (robbery, kidnapping, banditry, slavery, and Baal worship) and has since plotted to get revenge against Russia?
The same gangsters who have funded BOTH sides in every war worldwide since arriving in Manchester, England, in 1798, and setting up shop in the City of London in 1809.
Oh, how these gangsters HATE every religion, especially the Jewish one, and are now trying to start the next religious war between Christians and Muslims so that the gangsters will remain in control of the world.
The gangsters stay hidden, pretending to be central bankers, but bribe and blackmail those in authority to get their way. They've been doing that since the American War of Independence.
The gangsters attempted to use a biological weapon in 2021-21 to wipe out much of humanity, dubbed COVID-19, a result of prohibited gain-of-function research carried out at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and later transferred to Wuhan in China to keep prying eyes off. Nearly 50 biolabs were built in Ukraine to manufacture the bioweapon.
We can now see the connection between Israel and Ukraine, and the City of London, Paris, and Berne.
So, now crunch time comes: Will Israel use the Samson option soon as the gangsters lose their grip on power in the West?
In the meantime, don't fall for the Khazarian Mafia's attempts to enslave us all with digital IDs and currencies. NGOs are the gangsters' tools these days. Somehow, the world must take the blackmailing nukes away from these gangsters from Khazaria.
This article is based on posts on the Laura Aboili Telegram channel.
