CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE: Much of the research for the following article derives from the work of Dmitry Khalezov, a former Soviet nuclear specialist. Many thanks to Dmitry for his esteemed publication “9/11thology: The “third” truth about 9/11 or Defending the US Government, which has only the first two…”
Before we start… a definition:
Are you surprised? If you do not believe your eyes and prefer to run to the nearest bookstore or online at Amazon to buy some dictionary, don’t be in a hurry. When you arrive at such a shop, you will be surprised even more, because it is NO LONGER POSSIBLE to find ANY dictionary with the pure old definition of this peculiar term. Those dictionaries printed BEFORE 9/11, such as mentioned above, that contained the only true single meaning of “ground zero” term has been, a long time ago, removed from book-shelves and replaced with some newer ones.
Now you know how the Deep State tries to control the narrative. It’s why you shouldn’t trust websites like Wikipedia for ‘sensitive’ information.
And now some postcard pictures from this murderous event caused by PURE EVIL and its cohorts:
Now, what could cause all this? Super-strong steel girders beefed up the Twin Towers, so how come the one on the left has broken off at the top? And the stuff coming down isn’t concrete – it’s pulverized matter.
Definition: PULVERIZED: crushed, ground, minced, pounded, ATOMIZED. The process of applying an external force to a solid material of a certain size to DESTROY it and reduce it into smaller pieces than the original size. Both the U.S. and Soviet Union found pulverized matter at the locations of their underground nuclear weapon tests. Yep, pulverization easily occurs at the extremely high temperatures of a NUCLEAR EXPLOSION. No chemicals undergoing oxidation by electron transfer can pulverize matter; only nuclear energy can do that. So forget about thermite and all other such chemicals. Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of a metal powder and a metal oxide that produces an exothermic oxidation-reduction reaction known as a thermite reaction. Also, military-grade nanothermite doesn't exist, and even if it did, it would still result in a chemical reaction, not a nuclear one. Only nuclear energy can pulverize matter.
The picture below shows an example of that fine microscopic dust that covered all over Manhattan after the WTC demolition. Many people mistakenly believed that it was allegedly “concrete dust.” No, it was not concrete dust - it was “complete” dust – but mainly pulverized steel:
On saying that, there's another way of pulverizing matter: electric arc discharge - like what can create mountains and canyons, and etch craters on planets, asteroids, comets and moons - but that wasn't evident on 9/11. (That's a fascinating rabbit hole for truth-seekers to enter.)
Now look at the next image from that fateful day:
Fine white dust, eh? All caused by aviation fuel? Pull the other one, ABC. The fine white dust is PULVERIZED matter.
Nasty, isn’t it? Ooh, what’s that vapor? It’s not steam. Looks like a scene from an atomic explosion. Let’s look at it from above:
In the above image, vapor rises only from the locations of buildings WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7. What a giveaway…
Here's another shot from the air:
In the picture below, you can see what’s found underneath the Twin Towers after all the ‘heat’ and 'radioactivity' fizzled out after a few years. Yep, tell-tale signs of rock vitrification, as per standard underground nuke tests in the Nevada deserts and the Soviet Union:
BINGO! WOAH! THERE'S OUR...
Now we know why the Deep State, PURE EVIL NWO criminals had the true definition of "ground zero" removed from the English dictionaries the world over after the event of 9/11/2001. And dumbshit, scamming MSN reporters said that "no one knew that Manhattan was built on a former ice sheet!" Twats. What an effing, desperately inane explanation for the site of an underground NUCLEAR EXPLOSION.
Look at the ground zero cavity in the photo taken by Joe Woodhead on 28 August 2008 below:
Compare that with the following:
The cavity shown in the above photograph and diagram has been indeed made by a 150-kiloton nuclear explosion. Anyone who has basic knowledge about underground nuclear testing knows that a 150-kiloton charge detonated in granite rock would leave a final cavity of 100 meters in diameter. In accordance with the “1976 Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty,” the maximum yield of nuclear explosions for civil industry purposes must not exceed 150-kiloton, so it was EXACTLY the 150-kiloton nuclear charge that were used to create the above cavity. Two further ones were used and to bring down the other two WTC buildings.
In the above diagram showing the structure of the central zone nuclear borehole, the vertical lines labeled [B] are the post-test exploratory boreholes. The borehole in the photograph certainly does have an 'egg-shaped' structure with the sharper end facing upward. Are you convinced yet?
Now look at the following images showing deadly radiation:
Not a good place from which to admire the scenery... There’s lots of damaging radiation there following the three underground nuke explosions.
Brave but ignorant people. Well, it’s just their jobs, poor souls.
Now, here are images of the WTC7 building collapse:
And a BBC reporter was reporting LIVE ON TV that the building had collapsed before it did! Loads of people around the world saw the report! Yet the BBC states that the events of 9/11 are “seared” in the memory of reporter Jane Standley but that she “can’t remember” what happened minute by minute. Bullshit, BBC. Jane was reading a script. The BBC was IN ON the scam of 9/11, as were all of PURE EVIL’S fake news networks that day and after. Twats.
And the Solomon Brothers WTC7 building never got struck by a civilian airliner… So, what gives?
And here’s the Pentagon, the most highly protected military headquarters on the planet! Good timing that it also got rammed by an aircraft on 9/11. Coincidence?
Let’s have a closer look:
Can you see a Boeing 757 anywhere? The nice green lawn is still there. Lampposts are still erect. It wasn’t a 757; it was THIS: -
No, it WASN’T a Soviet attack. That’s one of the Granit missiles armed with a nuclear warhead STOLEN from the Soviet submarine “The Kursk,” reportedly by Israeli secret agents. A huge story that. A movie ought to be made on it. The Kursk, remember, was the nuclear submarine that sank on 12 August 2000, killing all 118 crew members, a year before 9/11.
It was a strange thing then that it was a Granit missile that struck the Pentagon (how come the USAF was sent far away for exercises on that day, 9/11?), but it had no ARMED nuclear warhead. It seems like it was a WARNING shot at the U.S. military…
New Footage of a Missile Hitting the Pentagon on 9/11/2001:
And the 'official reports say the Pentagon attack was by a Boeing 757 civilian aircraft. It looks very much like a missile thumping into the Pentagon, one of the missiles stolen by 'you know who' from the Kursk submarine.
To end this 9/11 post, let’s look at what previous nukes did when placed UNDERGROUND at strategic locations and which the scamming mainstream media reported as “truck” or “car bombings.” If you don’t know, when a nuke goes off above ground, no matter how small, there’ll always be a tell-tale MUSHROOM CLOUD:
The mere fact that nuclear munitions were used in the 2002 Bali bombing and the 2004 bombing of the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, as well as in several other instances, might sound unbelievable. However, the possession of these “mini-nukes” by “terrorists” and their widespread use in the disguise of so-called “truck-bombings” actually represent the main concept of modern so-called “terrorism” – blamed on the so-called “Al-Qaeda” and other alleged organizations – all of them being almost invariably “Muslim” ones. Without understanding the truth of these “mini-nuclear” bombings, it would be impossible to understand that idiotic zeal of the “patricians” who go on and on in their seemingly senseless fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq – in pursuit of something known only to those in the know.
In order to hide the fact that a nuke was used in a ‘terrorist’ car bombing event, the device HAS to be put UNDERGROUND. A truck bomb armed with chemical explosives certainly goes BANG, but the energy takes the path of LEAST RESISTANCE – THROUGH THE AIR. It NEVER goes downward into hard ground to produce a CRATER!!! If you see a CRATER following a reported ‘truck’ bombing, then it’s a tell-tale sign that a NUKE had been used, as the following images show:
Ouch! That was a big one, but still a small nuclear device. The 9/11 WTC bombs were much bigger and detonated deeper underground. So-called 'terrorist' nukes are just below the surface, so there's an accompanying damaging air blast. In Manhattan, the nuclear energy pulverized the towers up to 2/3rds of the way up, which is why we saw the top sections of the towers come crashing down in free-fall.
The Khobar Towers bombing was ‘reportedly’ a terrorist attack on part of a housing complex in Khobar, Saudi Arabia, near the Saudi Aramco oil company headquarters of Dhahran and nearby King Abdulaziz Air Base on 25 June 1996. The Khobar Towers were being used as living quarters for coalition forces assigned to Operation Southern Watch, a no-fly zone operation in southern Iraq, as part of the Iraqi no-fly zones. Now, who had access to nuclear weapons at the time? And it wasn't the Russians.
Do some research yourself on these. You’ll be surprised when you discover who was behind these events, and it’s not who the scamming MSM says it was.