In 2009, Virginia Giuffre accepted $500,000 from Jeffrey Epstein to drop a lawsuit, the terms of which forbade claims against other “potential defendants.”
13 years later, in 2022, Giuffre received some $16 million from the British royal, Prince Andrew, in an out-of-court settlement in which he admitted to no wrongdoing.
She was not required to keep to the terms of the previous settlement in which she released other “potential defendants.”
Her attorneys likely smelled a large fee from a charge against Prince Andrew.
Public accusations in a lawsuit would embarrass the Royal family and result in a large out-of-court settlement, whether the charge was true or false.
It is possible that the charge is false, but that $16 million was too much to walk away from.
As lawyers understand, many “settlements” are “extortions.”
The emphasis in the fake news-spreading mainstream media (MSM) is always that the women were under the age of 16.
That was 2 to 3 decades ago.
The MSM’s insistence on underage sex seems be a hoax.
It actually looks like prostitution.
Is it really true that the Virginia Giuffre, smiling and looking pleased with herself, standing together with Prince Andrew, was actually kidnapped and brought to Epstein’s Island by force and coercion?
Well, what about the hundreds or thousands of other underage girls who were allegedly kidnapped and forced into sex trafficking?
How exactly did Epstein manage a kidnapping operation of this order of magnitude?
Do the millions of pages of the Epstein files and his income tax returns indicate income from the sex-trafficking of hundreds of children?
From investigators’ reports of Epstein’s sources of income, his main source of income was devising tax evasion schemes for a few clients.
Virginia Giuffre’s large settlement payments likely inspired other women.
As there were allegedly so many rich and distinguished men who visited the alleged sex Island, people such as Bill Gates and former US President Bill Clinton, why then are ONLY Epstein and Prince Andrew targeted?
Something Very Big Stinks
Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase agreed to major settlements in 2023 regarding lawsuits from victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
Deutsche Bank paid $75 million in May 2023 to settle a class-action lawsuit.
JPMorgan Chase paid a $290 million settlement in June 2023 to resolve a separate lawsuit brought by women who accused the bank of facilitating the trafficking.
These are nebulous charges with an unclear legal basis.
It certainly looks like a witch hunt.
In 2019, Time Magazine reported that a judge allowed 23 women who claimed to be Epstein victims to speak in his court before he dismissed charges against Epstein.
About half did so anonymously.
The women urged prosecutors to investigate potential co-conspirators.
Maybe there is little that people will not do for money.
Indeed, a compensation fund was set up to indemnify Epstein’s victims.
Following Epstein’s alleged suicide in August 2019, the executors of his estate established the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program (VCP), which was launched in June 2020.
Here’s the thing: If hundreds of underage girls are sex-trafficked, supposedly each to many men, how come Prince Andrew is the ONLY man identified?
Allegedly, Epstein’s clients were the ELITE … but only ONE is identified.
The only evidence against Prince Andrew is that he paid to settle a claim.
But people do this to avoid the cost and publicity of a lawsuit.
In other words, many false claims ARE settled because it is the CHEAPEST way out.
The big question is: Where are the other 3 million files?
In other words, the fact that there is no evidence of enormous sex-trafficking is considered as proof that there was one, and the elites are being protected by withholding the evidence.
We are all being gaslighted.
We are under psychological manipulation where an abuser makes someone question their own reality, memory, or perceptions to gain power and control.
The Salem Witch Trials lacked evidence, but that did not protect the accused from being found guilty.
It’s beginning to look like the Epstein saga is a concoction to divert attention from the probability that Epstein was running a BLACKMAIL operation.
For Israel, focused on ELITES in positions able to align American and European Middle East policy with that of Israel’s?
This is a case justifying an investigation into whether the Epstein sex-trafficking saga is a concoction to hide the fact that Western elites were blackmailed into supporting the post 9/11 fake War on Terror to advance the Zionist agenda of a Greater Israel.
Prince Andrew was arrested on SUSPICION of misconduct in public office.
What? Since when was SUSPICION proof of a crime?
An arrest warrant CANNOT be issued on suspicion.
How thick can the fake news reporters be?
Andrew was arrested on suspicion that he MIGHT have shared with Epstein his work as a British trade negotiator.
Really?
We are all being GASLIGHTED, folks.
What is the alleged sex-trafficker Epstein’s interest in British trade negotiations?
Indeed, the British communist Starmer’s government has NO evidence whatsoever that Andrew shared trade negotiating information with Epstein.
It ONLY has a “SUSPICION.”
Police CANNOT arrest people on suspicion.
Police must have evidence that they can present to a judge and get a warrant.
It is now blatantly obvious that British “justice” does NOT work the way it is supposed to in a free country.
People’s reputations are ruined by being arrested on suspicion without evidence.
So, we are all being gaslighted by the BLACKMAILERS.
The possibility that evil Khazarian Zionists (not Jews) can concoct such a cover story to hide their blackmail operation and have it accepted by the entirety of the Western fake news mainstream media and idiot politicians is deeply worrying.
So, the Epstein fallout is a cover to keep focus off the blackmail operation.
We are witnessing the Salem Witch Trials 2.0, with Price Andrew as the ONLY witch on trial while the blackmail continues behind the scenes.
Talk about a Wag-the-Dog event.
Bloomberg reports:
“Former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on SUSPICION of misconduct in public office. The younger brother of King Charles III was previously stripped of his titles after details emerged about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“The Epstein fallout continues to spread. Bill Gates scrapped a keynote at a major AI summit in New Delhi, with his foundation saying the move was intended to keep attention on the event amid renewed scrutiny of his past ties to Epstein.
“Apollo Global Management has also sought to reassure clients that its top executives had no relationship with the disgraced financier after newly released Justice Department files named several employees, including CEO Marc Rowan.”
Stop being gaslighted, folks.
Being gaslighted is a form of psychological manipulation where an abuser makes someone question their own reality, memory, or perceptions to gain power and control.
It is a persistent pattern of behavior, often involving denial of facts, trivializing feelings, and twisting conversations, causing victims to doubt their sanity.
Aspects of being gaslighted include:
- Signs: Constant self-doubt, apologizing frequently, wondering if you are “too sensitive,” and losing confidence in your judgment.
- Tactics: The abuser may say “that never happened,” “you’re imagining things,” or “you’re too sensitive,” even when evidence contradicts them.
- Context: While often used in romantic relationships as a form of coercive control, it can also occur in work or family settings.
- Impact: It leads to extreme confusion, anxiety, and isolation, causing victims to rely heavily on the manipulator.
- Recovery: Rebuilding self-trust, documenting events, setting boundaries, and seeking therapy or support from friends/family is crucial to stopping the abuse.
Galslighting is recognized as a form of abuse, and in some contexts, such as the UK, it can be considered a criminal offense under coercive control laws.